Information orders against exchanges to aid the recovery of ... - JD Supra

As part of our series looking at the potential impact of recent cases on the future decisions of the Cayman Islands, BVI and Bermuda Courts relating to crypto assets, we consider the English decision of LMN v Bitflyer Holdings Inc and others [2022] EWHC 2954 (Comm), and specifically whether victims of cryptocurrency fraud are able to obtain Bankers Trust orders compelling cryptocurrency exchanges to disclose confidential information to help recover misappropriated cryptocurrency.
The applicant in LMN v Bitflyer and others was a cryptocurrency exchange (the "Applicant") which fell victim to a hack where millions of dollars-worth of cryptocurrency was stolen. In preparing to commence proceedings to recover the cryptocurrency, the Applicant instructed an expert to trace the stolen cryptocurrency. The expert was able to track the initial dissipation from the Applicant as such transactions stemmed from ‘Hot Wallets’ (i.e. wallets connected to the internet) and transfers were therefore recorded on the relevant cryptocurrency’s blockchains. However, when the cryptocurrency was transferred to an address / wallet maintained by a cryptocurrency exchange, this complicated the tracing exercise since the crediting of cryptocurrency to the customer’s account maintained by the exchange takes place "off-chain" (i.e. via an internal accounting exercise where such cryptocurrency is commingled in an ‘omnibus wallet’ used to service many customers). The misappropriated cryptocurrency processed by exchanges was therefore rendered untraceable making it necessary for the Applicant to seek information from the relevant exchanges in order to continue the tracing exercise and determine who was behind the relevant transactions.
In this instance, the Court considered that the test to obtain a Bankers Trust order was satisfied, namely that:
The Courts in the Cayman Islands, BVI and Bermuda have followed the English Courts in making Bankers Trust orders and we think it likely that they will be similarly willing to assist victims of theft and fraud in a crypto context where victims seek information to aid recovery of misappropriated crypto assets. Further, this decision affirms previous decisions which classify cryptocurrency as property and therefore subject to proprietary remedies and, crucially, serves as a timely reminder to cryptocurrency exchanges to ensure they comply with applicable KYC requirements given they may be compelled to produce such information where doing so assists the recovery of misappropriated crypto assets. If they are unable to comply with such orders, there would need to be a very good reason to avoid being in contempt of Court
See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Walkers | Attorney Advertising
Refine your interests »
Back to Top
Explore 2022 Readers’ Choice Awards
Copyright © JD Supra, LLC

source

How To Make Huge Profits In A Short Time With Crypto
Get detailed training system that shows an absolute beginner (without any skill) how to make huge profits in a short time with crypto.